//

Britain

A Review of The Iron Lady

It wasn’t long into the film before I could begin to see why the Thatcher family had flat-out refused to watch the film, and why some of the critics had had more than a few reservations about it. The depictions of the elderly Iron Lady, frail and hallucinating, take up a good portion of the film – and they are uncomfortable to watch. It’s harrowing, haunting, and yet oddly funny at times. If this had been any other old woman, her doddering nature could have been hilarious. Instead you find yourself suppressing a laugh out of fear of being disrespectful.

Nonetheless, these scenes have a powerful impact. As they go on, it becomes difficult to ignore the nagging feeling at the back of your mind that what’s being played out on the screen will come to us all in the end. As Meryl Streep has been saying in many interviews, this is a film about growing old, and the loss of both our autonomy and the people we love. The film also acts as a particularly stark portrayal of the effects of power. We are shown the physical and mental consequences of a woman who fought every day of her life to get to the top, held on to power for 11 years, and then lost everything when she thought she could go on forever. When you get to the end you realise that the reason why you feel so uneasy is that it’s probably closer to the truth than we’d dare admit.

On to the politics, then, as this is a politics blog. It’s a shame that Mrs Thatcher’s career, and especially her premiership, couldn’t have had a greater focus. This is inevitably going to happen in a 1 hour 45 minute film, so on this, the film can be forgiven. The major events, such as Maggie getting into Parliament, the Falklands War, the Miner’s Strike, are all shown as a series of flashbacks, which are cleverly woven into the main thread. There are some very good, very artistic transitions to and from them, and the switch of focus never feels forced. Perhaps the biggest gripe I have with the film is that these sequences hurtle along at a hectic pace, rumbling through the events with barely a pause for explanation. For Thatcherites and keen followers of politics, this isn’t so much of a problem, but for the curious non-politicos, it might be a little difficult to keep up, especially for viewers who didn’t live through the ‘80s.

Nonetheless, these scenes are very well done, beautifully shot, and brilliantly acted. Despite the complaints of some critics, I can find no fault with the performances of any of the cast. Meryl Streep is as good as everyone has claimed, and will probably get that Oscar. Jim Broadbent is similarly brilliant, offering some great humour to alleviate the depressing nature of modern-day scenes. While a couple of characters at times begin to turn to caricature (Richard E. Grant’s Michael Heseltine especially verges on it), it becomes necessary in a limited time-frame in order to convey a point.

Yes, it probably shouldn’t have been made while the lady herself is still alive, but I don’t feel that detracts from it as a piece of cinema. Overall, The Iron Lady is an interesting film that is beautifully played, offering a snapshot of the woman behind the handbag. However, as my girlfriend, a diehard Thatcherite, said to me when the credits starting rolling, while it is a great film in itself, as a biopic of Margaret Thatcher, it leaves something to be desired.

Share this article

Discussion

2 Responses to “A Review of The Iron Lady”

  1. Stephen Hoffman

    I have similar feelings to you about the film. The one thing I thought it importantly missed wa the importance of people such as Keith Joseph and William Whitelaw who were central to both Thathcher’s cabinet and Thatcherism.

    I also felt that the Long Walk to Finchley was better in some ways, as it was more respectful and more truthful. That said the woman who played the young Margaret was great. It was just a shame that Jim Broadbent couldn’t do Dennis Thatcher justice.

    All in All, I think it was another example of the left trying to undermine Lady T’s dignity. Thankfully, they failed again as Michael Hesseltine once again came across as the buffoon that he most definitely is!

    Posted by Stephen Hoffman | January 14, 2012, 7:39 pm
    • I think you’re digging to deep to try and find some political meaning to it!

      ”I think it was another example of the left trying to undermine Lady T’s dignity”

      =As far as I’m concerned its nothing to do with any left/right quarrel, I think it’s a thought provoking film about ageing and frailty, and human nature. The fact that it’s based on Thatcher is because she is possibly the starkest example of someone who had everything and lost it.

      If I were you I would try not to see it as an insult and not worry too much about the politics. It may be a political setting but it’s not a political film!

      Posted by Ben Bradley | January 16, 2012, 4:25 pm

Post a Comment

Subscribe Via Email

Don't miss out on a single post, sign up and get the latest news and articles delivered straight to your emails.

Enter your email address:


Join Us On Facebook

Follow Us On Twitter